Silly ideas on Java
Even if its pure bile, I couldn't agree more:
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/20050614#java6_delightful_new_features
on more or less the same line, in these days I'm trying to turn the intellij team to a sensible solution to the weird idea of compulsory html validation in intellij. some poster on the eap forum are so foolish to propose that html validation (like forgetting an alt on an img) should be at the same level of importance as the java validity of the resulting servlet, i.e. whether the jsp compiles or not. actually, one says that html validity is MORE important:
http://www.intellij.net/forums/thread.jsp?forum=22&thread=145269&tstart=0&trange=30
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/20050614#java6_delightful_new_features
on more or less the same line, in these days I'm trying to turn the intellij team to a sensible solution to the weird idea of compulsory html validation in intellij. some poster on the eap forum are so foolish to propose that html validation (like forgetting an alt on an img) should be at the same level of importance as the java validity of the resulting servlet, i.e. whether the jsp compiles or not. actually, one says that html validity is MORE important:
http://www.intellij.net/forums/thread.jsp?forum=22&thread=145269&tstart=0&trange=30
posted by Pietro Polsinelli at 10:54 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home